From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753928Ab1L2MMs (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Dec 2011 07:12:48 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:17773 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753810Ab1L2MMq (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Dec 2011 07:12:46 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="90521950" Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 12:25:31 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: Rakib Mullick Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging, gma500: Fix warning in power.c Message-ID: <20111229122531.08e17846@bob.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <1324579605.19018.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20111228140445.70c11f9c@bob.linux.org.uk> Organization: Intel X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Organisation: Intel Corporation UK Ltd, registered no. 1134945 (England), Registered office Pipers Way, Swindon, SN3 1RJ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Do I have to resend the patch, prepared against -rc7? Patch is on it's > way towards mainline through linux-next (Greg took it in his tree > previously). It might conflict during merging, not sure. If requires I > can send it again. What I meant was that the old driver is marked BROKEN for -next (ie won't be built), and in fact I sent GregKH a request to delete it. The driver in updated form has moved to drivers/gpu/drm/gma500 in the -next tree. Alan