All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 李刚 <gang.li@watchdata.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] 答复: Question: ieee80211_rx called twice after one ieee80211_subif_start_xmit call
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 19:13:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111230110404.07EBA2008C@mail.watchdata.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomR_1iN5rryyvui6iQGuN+3aWAets5NQjx+sHpZe8ck0w@mail.gmail.com>

> -----????-----
> ???: adrian.chadd at gmail.com [mailto:adrian.chadd at gmail.com] ?? Adrian
> Chadd
> ????: 2011?12?30? 17:31
> ???: ??
> ??: linux-wireless at vger.kernel.org; Ath9k Devel List
> ??: Re: Question: ieee80211_rx called twice after one
> ieee80211_subif_start_xmit call
> 
> 2011/12/30 ?? <gang.li@watchdata.com>:
> > Hi sirs,
> >
> >        Today, I noticed that when an data frame is sent by
> > ieee80211_subif_start_xmit, then ieee80211_rx will be called twice ,
first
> > is an Acknowledgement frame and second is the response data frame.  Is
this
> > the normal case?   It seems the RA frame is nonsense and just be freed
in
> > ieee80211_rx_monitor.
> >
> >        Is there anyway to tell the hardware not report RA frame to
> > mac80211?
> 
> .. its receiving ACKs? I thought it only did that when either promisc
> or control was enabled. Try fiddling around with the RX filter bitmask
> and see if you can determine (for your NIC :) which filter bit is
> doing it.
> 
> Maybe the interface is in promisc mode in hostap mode and this is why
> you're seeing ACKs.

Adrian? Thank you very much.

You reminded me that the RX filter is not correct, Yes, I almost forget that
I have changed the RX filter in ieee80211_configure_filter :

new_flags |= FIF_PROMISC_IN_BSS;

and the mode is STATION. 

What I want is to make two devices communicate directly without creating an
BSS or IBSS in advance, just using a wildcard BSSID instead.  But if setting
the RX flag as normal case 0 in STATION mode, the hardware can receive
noting. I don't know what's the matter. May be an BSSID must be set to the
hardware?  

> 
> 
> Adrian

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-30 11:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-17 23:18 Question about TCP Checksum errors Larry Finger
2011-12-17 23:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-19 11:38 ` Question about IEEE80211_TX_CTL_NO_ACK in ath_9k 李刚
2011-12-19 12:33   ` Mohammed Shafi
2011-12-19 13:03     ` 李刚
2011-12-19 12:33   ` Daniel Smith
2011-12-19 13:00     ` 李刚
2011-12-19 13:43       ` [ath9k-devel] " Daniel Smith
2011-12-19 13:43         ` Daniel Smith
2011-12-30  8:15         ` [ath9k-devel] Question: ieee80211_rx called twice after one ieee80211_subif_start_xmit call 李刚
2011-12-30  8:15           ` 李刚
2011-12-30  9:30           ` [ath9k-devel] " Adrian Chadd
2011-12-30  9:30             ` Adrian Chadd
2011-12-30 11:13             ` 李刚 [this message]
2012-01-07  2:11         ` [ath9k-devel] Question about duration of data frame in ath9k_htc 李刚
2012-01-07  2:11           ` 李刚
2012-01-07  5:31           ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-01-07  5:31             ` Sujith Manoharan
2011-12-19 13:07   ` Question about IEEE80211_TX_CTL_NO_ACK in ath_9k Helmut Schaa
2011-12-19 14:42   ` Sujith
2011-12-20  5:39     ` 李刚
2011-12-20 15:24       ` Sujith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111230110404.07EBA2008C@mail.watchdata.com.cn \
    --to=gang.li@watchdata.com \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.