All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@opendz.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/ext{3,4}: fix potential race when setversion ioctl updates inode
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 00:14:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120103231432.GA23522@dztty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120103124624.GB31457@quack.suse.cz>

On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:46:24PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
>   Hello,
> 
> On Tue 03-01-12 02:31:52, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> > 
> > The EXT{3,4}_IOC_SETVERSION ioctl() updates the inode without i_mutex,
> > this can lead to a race with the other operations that update the same
> > inode.
> > 
> > Patch tested.
>   Thanks for the patch but I don't quite understand the problem.
> i_generation is set when:
>   a) inode is loaded from disk
>   b) inode is allocated
>   c) in SETVERSION ioctl
> 
>   The only thing that can race here seems to be c) against c) and that is
> racy with i_mutex as well. So what problems do you exactly observe without
> the patch?
Right, but what about the related i_ctime change ? (i_ctime is updated in
other places...)

The i_ctime update must reflect the _appropriate_ inode modification
operation. This is why IMHO we should protect them to avoid a lost update.

BTW the i_generation which is used by NFS and fuse filesystems is updated
even if the inode is marked immutable, is this the intended behaviour?


> 								Honza
Thanks for your response.

-- 
tixxdz
http://opendz.org

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-03 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-03  1:31 [PATCH] fs/ext{3,4}: fix potential race when setversion ioctl updates inode Djalal Harouni
2012-01-03 12:46 ` Jan Kara
2012-01-03 23:14   ` Djalal Harouni [this message]
2012-01-04 17:34     ` Jan Kara
2012-01-04 17:46 ` Jan Kara
2012-01-04 23:15   ` Andreas Dilger
2012-01-04 23:32     ` Jan Kara
2012-01-04 23:56       ` Andreas Dilger
2012-01-05  0:40       ` Djalal Harouni
2012-01-05 11:42         ` Jan Kara
2012-01-06  1:00           ` Djalal Harouni
2012-01-09 15:03             ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120103231432.GA23522@dztty \
    --to=tixxdz@opendz.org \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.