All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Yann Dupont <Yann.Dupont@univ-nantes.fr>
Cc: stan@hardwarefreak.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Bad performance with XFS + 2.6.38 / 2.6.39
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 07:33:31 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120104123331.GA12204@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F02BA35.9040909@univ-nantes.fr>

On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:20:05AM +0100, Yann Dupont wrote:
> >As it is, I can't see any material difference between the traces.
> >both reads and writes are taking the same amount of time to service,
> >so I don't think there's any problem here.
> 
> ok,
> >
> >I do recall that some years ago that we changed one of the ways we
> 
> Do you recall exactly what some years ago means ? Is this post 2.6.26 era ?

The only thing that I remember is Jens switching xfs_buf_wait_unpin from
schedule to io_schedule in "block: remove per-queue plugging", which
went into Linux 2.6.39.  With this processed that wait for buffers to
be unpinned now count towards the load average.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-04 12:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-11 12:45 Bad performance with XFS + 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 Xupeng Yun
2011-12-11 23:39 ` Dave Chinner
2011-12-12  0:40   ` Xupeng Yun
2011-12-12  1:00     ` Dave Chinner
2011-12-12  2:00       ` Xupeng Yun
2011-12-12 13:57         ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-21  9:08         ` Yann Dupont
2011-12-21 15:10           ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-12-21 17:56             ` Yann Dupont
2011-12-21 22:26               ` Dave Chinner
2011-12-22  9:23                 ` Yann Dupont
2011-12-22 11:02                   ` Yann Dupont
2012-01-02 10:06                     ` Yann Dupont
2012-01-02 16:08                       ` Peter Grandi
2012-01-02 18:02                         ` Peter Grandi
2012-01-04 10:54                         ` Yann Dupont
2012-01-02 20:35                       ` Dave Chinner
2012-01-03  8:20                         ` Yann Dupont
2012-01-04 12:33                           ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2012-01-04 13:06                             ` Yann Dupont

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120104123331.GA12204@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=Yann.Dupont@univ-nantes.fr \
    --cc=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.