From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] netfilter: Add possibility to turn off netfilters defrag per netns Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:40:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20120104174035.GB3489@1984> References: <1325664443-10320-1-git-send-email-hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com> <201201041118.18552.hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com> <201201041248.36881.hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jan Engelhardt , Jozsef Kadlecsik , Patrick McHardy , "netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "hans@schillstrom.com" To: Hans Schillstrom Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201201041248.36881.hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:48:35PM +0100, Hans Schillstrom wrote: > I like that idea, an "early" table at prio -500 with PREROUTING. > There is also a need for a new flag "--allfrags" > i.e. all fragments needs to be sorted out and sent to same dest for defrag. > > ex. > iptables -t early -A PREROUTING -i eth0 --allfrags -j NOTRACK New tables add too much overhead. We have discussed this before with Patrick. Since this still remains specific to your needs, I think you can remove nf_conntrack module in your setup. I don't come with one sane setup that may want selectively defragment some traffic yes and other not. Am I missing anything else?