From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757324Ab2AESTj (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:19:39 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51966 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753099Ab2AESTi (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:19:38 -0500 Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:13:53 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Bruno =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pr=E9mont?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 3.0.15 Message-ID: <20120105181353.GA11863@suse.de> References: <20120103192936.GA1724@kroah.com> <20120105190219.38952ddf@neptune.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20120105190219.38952ddf@neptune.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 07:02:19PM +0100, Bruno Prémont wrote: > Hi Greg, > > For some reason the last few stable updates to 3.0 don't show up on > that main www.kernel.org page though the other stable updates do (for 3.1 > and for 2.6.32). > The last 3.0 stable update showing up is 3.0.9 (but that's far from > being the most recent one), still the files for the following ones do > exist. > > The upload-post-processing script probably does not like 3.0... Yes, this is a known issue and is being worked on, thanks. greg k-h