All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
To: hongkaixing@huawei.com
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xenpaging:add a new array to speed up page-in in xenpaging
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 21:59:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120105205910.GA29311@aepfle.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <052727b8165ce6e05002.1325732917@h00166998.china.huawei.com>

On Thu, Jan 05, hongkaixing@huawei.com wrote:

> # HG changeset patch
> # User hongkaixing<hongkaixing@huawei.com>
> # Date 1325149704 -28800
> # Node ID 052727b8165ce6e05002184ae894096214c8b537
> # Parent  54a5e994a241a506900ee0e197bb42e5f1d8e759
> xenpaging:add a new array to speed up page-in in xenpaging
> 
> This patch adds a new array named page_out_index to reserve the victim's index.
> When page in a page,it has to go through a for loop from 0 to num_pages to find
> the right page to read,and it costs much time in this loop.After adding the
> page_out_index array,it just reads the arrry to get the right page,and saves much time.
> 
> The following is a xenpaging test on suse11-64 with 4G memories.
> 
> Nums of page_out pages	Page out time	Page in time(in unstable code) Page in time(apply this patch)
> 512M(131072)		    2.6s		           540s			             530s
> 2G(524288)		    15.5s		           2088s			     2055s

Thanks for your work on this.

Is the page-out time for 512M really that fast? For me page-out is still
really slow even when the pagefile is in tmpfs. It takes several
minutes, I get around 4MB/s. page-in is around 20MB/s.

Wether an extra array is needed, we have to decide as it costs some
runtime memory. I was thinking already about better bitop functions,
like xc_find_next_bit_set and similar, just what xenpaging needs, to
remove the test bits one-by-one.

As for the new page-in op, there was some offline discussion about doing
page-in/page-out differently. If these ideas make into xen-unstable most
of domctls will disappear, and also the mmap to trigger page-in is not
needed anymore.

Olaf

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-01-05 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-05  3:08 [PATCH] xenpaging:add a new array to speed up page-in in xenpaging hongkaixing
2012-01-05 18:27 ` Ian Jackson
2012-01-06  2:35   ` Hongkaixing
2012-01-05 18:31 ` Ian Jackson
2012-01-06  2:35   ` Hongkaixing
2012-01-10 17:39     ` Olaf Hering
2012-01-11  7:15       ` Hongkaixing
2012-01-12 14:20         ` Olaf Hering
2012-01-09 11:50   ` Olaf Hering
2012-01-05 20:59 ` Olaf Hering [this message]
2012-01-06  2:35   ` Hongkaixing
2012-01-06 13:07   ` Olaf Hering
2012-01-07  8:55     ` Hongkaixing
2012-01-09 13:13       ` Olaf Hering

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120105205910.GA29311@aepfle.de \
    --to=olaf@aepfle.de \
    --cc=hongkaixing@huawei.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.