From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: synchronous register in kvm_run Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:49:25 -0200 Message-ID: <20120109124925.GA10607@amt.cnet> References: <1325757285-59875-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <4F0ADF7D.4080209@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avi Kivity , Carsten Otte , Alexander Graf , Jens Freimann , Cornelia Huck , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , KVM To: Christian Borntraeger Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44313 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753323Ab2AIMuf (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2012 07:50:35 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F0ADF7D.4080209@de.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 01:37:17PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 05/01/12 10:54, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > Avi, Marcelo, > > > > here is the latest update of my patch set about guest registers in kvm_run. > > I have added an u64 flag field to make the whole structure extensible > > (and shrinkable). > > For s390 I added the prefix register as read-only and access and general > > purpose as read write. > > Any feedback or suggestions on these patches? I don't have any comments - Avi? Probably have to regenerate against next branch (which contains the ucontrol patches).