From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block_dev: Suppress bdev_cache_init() kmemleak warninig
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 23:03:16 +0000
Message-ID: <20120109230316.GZ23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <20120109224436.GA3429@swordfish>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120109224436.GA3429@swordfish>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 01:44:36AM +0300, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:

> due to attempt to mark pointer to `struct vfsmount' as a gray object, which
> is embedded into `struct mount' returned from alloc_vfsmnt(). Pass actual
> allocated `struct mount' pointer to kmemleak_not_leak() instead.

*snort*

how about turning bd_mnt into a static instead and to hell with messing with
annotations?  It's not like one word of .bss was worth those convolutions...