From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com>
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
"netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org"
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] netfilter: Add possibility to turn off netfilters defrag per netns
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:17:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120110031714.GA31483@1984> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201201090958.43017.hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com>
Hi Hans,
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 09:58:42AM +0100, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
> > I wonder if we can conditionally register the sysctl only if we are
> > inside one lxc container.
> >
> Sure no problem, but the code will not be so nice ...
Indeed, ugly indeed.
> > I'm telling this because this sysctl does not seem to make any sense
> > to me outside of it.
>
> I'm not so sure that we should make it asymetric,
> but it's not a big deal.
>
> Anyway here is a sample of the sysctl in a namespace.
> It is the "if (!net_eq(net, &init_net)) {..." that does the magic
Hm, after having a look at it, I think I prefer to provide some
inconditional sysctl.
Better call it nf_conntrack_enable and set it to 1 by default. AFAICS,
this will be a synonymous of:
iptables -I PREROUTING -t raw -j NOTRACK
This option is disabling conntracking after all. I don't think we
would ever support conntrack with fragments.
Please, send a patch including in the description that we need this
for lxc, I'll enqueue it for net-next unless someone raise the hand
with a better solution.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-10 3:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-04 8:07 [PATCH 1/1] netfilter: Add possibility to turn off netfilters defrag per netns Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-04 8:28 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-01-04 8:49 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-04 9:03 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-01-04 9:32 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-01-04 9:47 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-04 17:23 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-01-04 9:49 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-01-04 10:18 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-04 11:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-01-04 11:48 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-04 17:40 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-01-04 18:05 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-01-04 20:56 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-04 21:40 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-01-05 7:19 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-05 9:11 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2012-01-05 14:18 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-01-09 8:58 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-10 3:17 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2012-01-04 20:45 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-04 21:15 ` Hans Schillstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120110031714.GA31483@1984 \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.