From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] kernel freezes with latest tree
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:14:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120111161431.GA1233@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1326297936.2442.157.camel@twins>
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 16:56 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > Well, what happens if every CPU runs load_balance() and we keep
> > triggering:
> >
> > if (loops++ > sysctl_sched_nr_migrate) {
> > *lb_flags |= LBF_NEED_BREAK;
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > in this case load_balance() will do the retry:
> >
> > if (lb_flags & LBF_NEED_BREAK) {
> > lb_flags &= ~LBF_NEED_BREAK;
> > goto redo;
> > }
> >
> > but the retry starts the loop again:
> >
> > list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &busiest_cfs_rq->tasks, se.group_node) {
> >
> > so nobody is able to make progress: livelock/lockup.
>
> Ah, right! Silly me. One possibility is to rotate that list, except that
> won't work for the cgroup case where we have another iteration.
>
> OK, here's an updated patch..
>
> ---
> Subject: sched: Limit load-balance retries on lock-break
> From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> Date: Wed Jan 11 13:11:12 CET 2012
>
> Eric and David reported dead machines and traced it to commit a195f004 ("sched:
> Fix load-balance lock-breaking"), it turns out there's still a
> scenario where we can end up re-trying forever.
>
> Since there is no strict forward progress guarantee in the
> load-balance iteration we can get stuck re-retrying the same task-set
> over and over.
>
> Creating a forward progress guarantee with the existing structure is
> somewhat non-trivial, for now simply terminate the retry loop after a
> few tries.
>
> Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> [eric: logic cleanup]
> Tested-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-ya9m8grb9wfc26uqnviq2wjq@git.kernel.org
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Thanks Peter, i'll get this fix to Linus ASAP.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-11 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-10 4:57 [BUG] kernel freezes with latest tree Eric Dumazet
2012-01-10 5:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-10 8:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-10 16:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-10 16:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-10 16:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-10 16:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-10 16:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-10 17:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-10 19:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-10 22:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-10 23:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-11 6:35 ` David Ahern
2012-01-11 9:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-11 10:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-11 11:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-11 12:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-11 13:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-11 15:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-11 16:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-11 16:14 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-01-11 16:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-11 16:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-12 6:17 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix lockup by limiting load-balance retries on lock-break tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-11 8:22 ` [BUG] kernel freezes with latest tree Eric Dumazet
2012-01-11 14:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-01-10 16:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-10 16:33 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120111161431.GA1233@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.