From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Samsung devel for v3.3 Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:29:20 +0000 Message-ID: <20120111172918.GA24213@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <018801ccca70$25f01260$71d03720$%kim@samsung.com> <201201102013.54958.arnd@arndb.de> <20120110223712.GL7164@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <201201111619.05650.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:51975 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757268Ab2AKR3W (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:29:22 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Olof Johansson Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Nicolas Pitre , Russell King - ARM Linux , Kukjin Kim , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, ben-linux@fluff.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 08:50:54AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > I would also prefer if people stopped having their own trees included > > in next, but I know that I'm sometimes slow to pick up patches that > I also have to admit, as tegra maintainer, that it is convenient to > have my tree in linux-next, and have things show up in linux-next as > soon as I pick it up, and then send arm-soc pull requests about once a > week or so. While we should reduce latency to pull into arm-soc, > getting pull requests daily will be a bit on the heavy side. Plus it also means that if there are problems you can resolve it directly rather than having to get the fixes included in a separate tree which helps cut down on latencies. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:29:20 +0000 Subject: [GIT PULL] Samsung devel for v3.3 In-Reply-To: References: <018801ccca70$25f01260$71d03720$%kim@samsung.com> <201201102013.54958.arnd@arndb.de> <20120110223712.GL7164@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <201201111619.05650.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <20120111172918.GA24213@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 08:50:54AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > I would also prefer if people stopped having their own trees included > > in next, but I know that I'm sometimes slow to pick up patches that > I also have to admit, as tegra maintainer, that it is convenient to > have my tree in linux-next, and have things show up in linux-next as > soon as I pick it up, and then send arm-soc pull requests about once a > week or so. While we should reduce latency to pull into arm-soc, > getting pull requests daily will be a bit on the heavy side. Plus it also means that if there are problems you can resolve it directly rather than having to get the fixes included in a separate tree which helps cut down on latencies.