From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:52:12 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: tim.gardner@canonical.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Latest kernel stable/longterm status
Message-ID: <20120111205212.GA18902@kroah.com>
References: <20120110003705.GA9482@kroah.com>
 <20120110022617.GA11376@home.goodmis.org>
 <4F0C0CF5.1080706@gmail.com>
 <20120110235612.GB1507@kroah.com>
 <4F0D6006.40506@canonical.com>
 <20120111151218.GB24077@kroah.com>
 <4F0DF2F3.8080902@canonical.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F0DF2F3.8080902@canonical.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:37:07PM +0100, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 04:12 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> >As I previously stated, in this email, I already have someone lined up
> >to maintain 2.6.32 after I am done with it, but I'm sure that person
> >would love it if you would send any needed patches to
> >stable@vger.kernel.org to help them out.
> >
> >greg k-h
> 
> I'm happy to work with whomever. Your original email with "it might
> be picked up by someone else, but I'm not going to promise anything"
> didn't seem that definite.

Sorry, I didn't want to put words in the mouth of someone else, but
given that Willy has done a great job with 2.4 and 2.6.16, I'm pretty
sure he will continue to do well with 2.6.32.

thanks,

greg k-h