From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@cs.technion.ac.il>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: Fix writeback on page boundary that propagate changes in spite of #PF
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:27:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120112102745.GX2167@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F0EB40C.7060201@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:21:00PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/12/2012 12:12 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 06:53:31PM +0200, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > > Consider the case in which an instruction emulation writeback is performed on a page boundary.
> > > In such case, if a #PF occurs on the second page, the write to the first page already occurred and cannot be retracted.
> > > Therefore, validation of the second page access must be performed prior to writeback.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > > 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > index 05fd3d7..7af3d67 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > @@ -3626,6 +3626,8 @@ struct read_write_emulator_ops {
> > > int bytes, void *val);
> > > int (*read_write_exit_mmio)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
> > > void *val, int bytes);
> > > + gpa_t (*read_write_validate)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva,
> > > + struct x86_exception *exception);
> > > bool write;
> > > };
> > >
> > > @@ -3686,6 +3688,7 @@ static struct read_write_emulator_ops write_emultor = {
> > > .read_write_emulate = write_emulate,
> > > .read_write_mmio = write_mmio,
> > > .read_write_exit_mmio = write_exit_mmio,
> > > + .read_write_validate = kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_write,
> > > .write = true,
> > > };
> > >
> > > @@ -3750,6 +3753,16 @@ int emulator_read_write(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned long addr,
> > > int rc, now;
> > >
> > > now = -addr & ~PAGE_MASK;
> > > +
> > > + /* First check there is no page-fault on the next page */
> > > + if (ops->read_write_validate &&
> > > + ops->read_write_validate(vcpu, addr+now, exception) ==
> > > + UNMAPPED_GVA) {
> > > + /* #PF on the first page should be reported first */
> > > + ops->read_write_validate(vcpu, addr, exception);
> > > + return X86EMUL_PROPAGATE_FAULT;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > This undoes optimization that vcpu_mmio_gva_to_gpa() has for handling
> > mmio.
>
> Right. I suggest changing I/O to have two phases: first, translate the
> virtual address into an array of two physical addresses; check
> exceptions and report. Then do the actual writes.
>
> > Furthermore for common (non faulting) case we will check page
> > tables twice on each write that crosses page boundary, first time here
> > and second time in emulator_read_write_onepage().
>
> Those should be very uncommon.
>
Still it is better to have all the checks in one place like you suggest
above.
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-12 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-11 16:53 [PATCH 1/2] KVM: Exception during emulation decode should propagate Nadav Amit
2012-01-11 16:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: Fix writeback on page boundary that propagate changes in spite of #PF Nadav Amit
2012-01-12 10:12 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-12 10:21 ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-12 10:27 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2012-01-14 18:27 ` Nadav Amit
2012-01-11 22:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: Exception during emulation decode should propagate Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-01-12 0:26 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-01-12 9:07 ` Nadav Amit
2012-01-12 9:14 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-01-12 10:16 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120112102745.GX2167@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=namit@cs.technion.ac.il \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.