From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: skb_checksum_help() vs GSO
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:10:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120112141017.0a83e973@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1326400930.2740.10.camel@bwh-desktop>
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:42:10 +0000
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> wrote:
> skb_checksum_help() does:
>
> if (unlikely(skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size)) {
> /* Let GSO fix up the checksum. */
> goto out_set_summed;
> }
> ...
> out_set_summed:
> skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
> out:
> return ret;
>
> but skb_gso_segment() requires that skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL
> and WARNs if not. I don't think there's any case where it's valid to
> call both. Shouldn't skb_checksum_help() also WARN and return an error
> code instead of muddling on?
>
> Inspecting the callers of skb_checksum_help(), it looks like sch_netem's
> 'corrupt' option and xt_CHECKSUM might trigger this case.
>
> Ben.
Netem needs to check for GSO manually segment before calling skb_checksum_help.
I'll sort it out.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-12 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-12 20:42 skb_checksum_help() vs GSO Ben Hutchings
2012-01-12 22:03 ` Herbert Xu
2012-01-13 0:57 ` [RFC] netem: de-GSO packets before enqueing Stephen Hemminger
2012-01-13 15:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-13 19:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-01-13 23:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-14 16:06 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2012-01-12 22:10 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120112141017.0a83e973@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.