From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dimitri Yioulos <dyioulos@onpointfc.com>
Subject: Re: Dual WAN set-up
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:22:30 -0500
Message-ID: <201201121822.30541.dyioulos@onpointfc.com>
References: <201201121651.18887.dyioulos@onpointfc.com> <op.v7zujutux1lyi3@debiandesk2.net> <op.v7zuquhcx1lyi3@debiandesk2.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <op.v7zuquhcx1lyi3@debiandesk2.net>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: "netfilter@vger.kernel.org" <netfilter@vger.kernel.org>

On Thursday 12 January 2012 6:12:20 pm Lloyd Standish wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:08:08 -0600, Lloyd Standish 
<lloyd@crnatural.net> wrote:
> > Shouldn't your diagram indicate that the fw is connected to
> > the WAN (not to the DMZ)?  I will proceed under that
> > assumption.  If you have a netfilters firewall installed, I
> > think all interfaces would go "through" it.
>
> PS I meant to say, the WAN is connected to the fw, not directly
> to the DMZ. --
> Lloyd
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> netfilter" in the body of a message to
> majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at 
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Lloyd,

I should have read all your posts - correct, the WAN is connected 
to the fw.  So is the DMZ.

Dimitri

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.