[U-Boot] [PATCH] omap3: board.c - Fix compile warnings

[Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>]

> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Pali Roh?r <pali.rohar@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Saturday 14 January 2012 21:12:00 Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> >  * This patch fix compile warnings when CONFIG_SYS_L2CACHE_OFF is
> >> > enabled
> >> > 
> >> >    board.c:48:13: warning: ?omap3_invalidate_l2_cache_secure? declared
> >> > 
> >> > ?static? but never defined board.c:373:13: warning:
> >> > ?omap3_update_aux_cr? defined but not used
> >> > 
> >> > Signed-off-by: Pali Roh?r <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > 
> >> >  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/board.c |    5 +++++
> >> >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >> > 
> >> > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/board.c
> >> > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/board.c index 1f33c63..52514ae 100644
> >> > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/board.c
> >> > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/board.c
> >> > @@ -45,7 +45,10 @@
> >> > 
> >> >  /* Declarations */
> >> >  extern omap3_sysinfo sysinfo;
> >> >  static void omap3_setup_aux_cr(void);
> >> > 
> >> > +
> >> > +#ifndef CONFIG_SYS_L2CACHE_OFF
> >> > 
> >> >  static void omap3_invalidate_l2_cache_secure(void);
> >> > 
> >> > +#endif
> >> 
> >> This is due to the ordering, right ? Now, split this into two patches,
> >> because you're actually doing two unrelated things.
> > 
> > No, function omap3_invalidate_l2_cache_secure is defined in block #ifndef
> > CONFIG_SYS_L2CACHE_OFF. So declaration should be in #ifndef too.
> 
> Right, but if we move the function to be just before it's used, inside
> the existing ifndef block we can remove the prototype instead.

Yep, it's just an function ordering issue being solved here.

M