From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id rtDynVEo6wil for <dm-crypt@saout.de>;
 Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:06:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de
 [212.227.126.187]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
 for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:06:07 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:05:01 +0100
From: Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
Message-ID: <20120115150501.GA6373@fancy-poultry.org>
References: <20120112150640.GA1918@fancy-poultry.org>
 <4F0EFAD3.3090908@redhat.com> <20120112162815.GA13265@tansi.org>
 <4F0F2442.4060004@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F0F2442.4060004@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] Twofish 3-way
List-Id: <dm-crypt.saout.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/options/dm-crypt>,
 <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.saout.de/pipermail/dm-crypt>
List-Post: <mailto:dm-crypt@saout.de>
List-Help: <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt>,
 <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=subscribe>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de

On 12.01.2012, Milan Broz wrote: 

> Hm, right. But I think XTS can process blocks in one sector
> in parallel as well, but I just saw generic tcrypt tests
> (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-crypto/msg06351.html),
> not dmcrypt based numbers...

This raises an important question: is there any improvement in using
3-way twofish with LUKS/dmcrypt at all?