All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Indan Zupancic <indan@nul.nu>,
	Youquan Song <youquan.song@intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] sched: unified sched_powersavings tunables
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:52:26 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120116161740.29759.4679.stgit@localhost> (raw)

Hi,

I have created the following RFC patch based on the recent discussions
and consensus on simplifying the power aware scheduler in the kernel.

Ref: LWN: Rethinking power-aware scheduling
     http://lwn.net/Articles/474915/

The goal of the unified tunable are as follows:

* Simple and single tunable for different (all) topology
* Good default powersavings for kernel
* Potential to map this setting to other subsystems like cpufreq and
  cpuidle    

What this patch does: (first step)

* Create a single sched_powersavings tunable in sysfs
* Enable current sched_mc and sched_smt features based on 
  value of this single tunable

What this patch is yet to do:

* Tune the default power savings to pack packages only till
  a threshold of say 50%
* Add notifiers to change setting on battery/AC transitions
* Feed the thresholds from arch specific code so that different archs
  can do 'optimal' packing based on topology  
* May be move this to /sys/device/system/powersavings and add additional
  platform tunables like x86_energy_perf_policy?

This RFC has only x86 changes and has been tested on dual-socket,
quad-core,HT configuration.

Please let me know your comments and feedback.

Thanks,
Vaidy

---

Vaidyanathan Srinivasan (2):
      sched: unified sched_powersavings sysfs tunable
      sched: fix group_capacity for thread level consolidation


 arch/x86/Kconfig          |   20 ++++--------
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c |    2 +
 block/blk.h               |   11 ++++---
 drivers/base/cpu.c        |    2 +
 include/linux/sched.h     |   29 +++++++++--------
 include/linux/topology.h  |    9 +----
 kernel/sched/core.c       |   75 +++++++++++----------------------------------
 kernel/sched/fair.c       |   38 ++++++++++++++++-------
 8 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)


             reply	other threads:[~2012-01-16 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-16 16:22 Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [this message]
2012-01-16 16:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] sched: unified sched_powersavings sysfs tunable Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-25 14:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-26 10:42     ` Jens Axboe
2012-01-26 11:08       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-26 11:26         ` Jens Axboe
2012-01-26 12:04           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-26 12:13             ` Jens Axboe
2012-01-26 12:39               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-26 12:46                 ` Jens Axboe
2012-01-28 12:06             ` [tip:sched/core] sched, block: Unify cache detection tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-27  9:35     ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] sched: unified sched_powersavings sysfs tunable Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-25 14:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-27  9:16     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-25 15:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-25 15:12     ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-01-25 15:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-27  9:22     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-27  9:40       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-16 16:22 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] sched: fix group_capacity for thread level consolidation Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-25 15:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-27  9:10     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-01-17 18:44 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] sched: unified sched_powersavings tunables Vaidyanathan Srinivasan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120116161740.29759.4679.stgit@localhost \
    --to=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=indan@nul.nu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=youquan.song@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.