From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Renninger Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ACPI processor: Avoid WARN message on processor driver removal Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:25:15 +0100 Message-ID: <201201171525.15937.trenn@suse.de> References: <1321569421-46220-1-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de> <1321569421-46220-3-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de> <4F15554F.8040900@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:58226 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754376Ab2AQOZS (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:25:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4F15554F.8040900@kernel.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 12:02:39 PM Len Brown wrote: > On 11/17/2011 05:36 PM, Thomas Renninger wrote: ... > I think the old cold reads better than the new code, > since I don't have to guess what "acpi_idle_active" means... Sigh, Bjorn suggested it exactly the other way around. I don't mind which way, back to my original post half a year ago... Thomas