From: Holger Macht <holger@homac.de>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/7] acpi/libata: Express dependencies for devices on dock stations and bays
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:00:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120121140048.GA15111@homac.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1327154100.11421.5.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>
On Sat 21. Jan - 07:55:00, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 01:23 +0100, Holger Macht wrote:
> > On Fr 20. Jan - 01:18:18, Holger Macht wrote:
> > > Patches 2 through 5 are just a refresh of the patches from Matthew
> > > Garrett sent to this list in September 2010 [1]:
> >
> > I successfully faked the sender of the patches from Matthew (now it
> > looks as they were sent by him) due to the use wrong use of git
> > format-patch. Sorry for that, really wasn't intended. Hope this is not a
> > problem.
>
> Actually, it is; the way you sent them the first time: From: in the
> body is the correct way. If you go about faking the sender, you're
> likely to get rejected as spam if people do SPF checking. Plus it's a
> bit confusing for maintainers because I'd really like to know who sent
> the patch to verify the signoff chain.
Sure, I rather meant this like "hope it's not a problem this one
time". It was by plain mistake because my mutt took the "From:" header
as it should and I didn't notice. I also don't want people to send mails
in my name, that's what the apology actually was for, directed to
Matthew.
>
> Other than this, it looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Holger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-21 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-20 0:18 [PATCHv2 0/7] acpi/libata: Express dependencies for devices on dock stations and bays Holger Macht
2012-01-20 0:23 ` Holger Macht
2012-01-21 13:55 ` James Bottomley
2012-01-21 14:00 ` Holger Macht [this message]
2012-02-09 6:46 ` Lin Ming
2012-02-09 7:33 ` Holger Macht
2012-02-09 15:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-03-27 8:11 ` Lin Ming
2012-04-02 9:22 ` Holger Macht
2012-04-02 15:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-04-02 16:43 ` Holger Macht
2012-04-02 17:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-04-02 18:39 ` Holger Macht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120121140048.GA15111@homac.suse.de \
--to=holger@homac.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=jgarzik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.