From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Frysinger Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 02:32:13 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/8] sandbox: fdt: Add support for CONFIG_OF_CONTROL In-Reply-To: References: <1326242752-9981-1-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org> <201201201354.08053.vapier@gentoo.org> Message-ID: <201201230232.14830.vapier@gentoo.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Monday 23 January 2012 00:27:56 Simon Glass wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday 10 January 2012 19:45:45 Simon Glass wrote: > >> This adds support for a controlling fdt, mirroring the ARM > >> implementation. > > > > OK, but what's the point if we aren't doing FDT's ? > > Aren't we? i don't see FDT's getting used anywhere in this patch or this patch series. so no, we aren't currently doing FDT's in sandbox. > I hope that sandbox provides a way of testing the FDT > stuff. I used it for the fdtdec alias stuff which was complicated > enough that it needed unit tests. if it actually can be used/tested under sandbox, then i'm fine with this. but can that actually be done now or are other things necessary first ? > We need to enable these options to bring in that code, even if we don't > actually have a run-time FDT yet. i don't see how run-time FDT's would be used by sandbox ... -mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: