From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pv drivers: wrap xen_cpuid_base()
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:22:32 +0100
Message-ID: <20120123142232.GA8983@aepfle.de>
References: <88bddf1f0bafade64316.1327326599@probook.site>
	<4F1D786A020000780006E6D1@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F1D786A020000780006E6D1@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Mon, Jan 23, Jan Beulich wrote:

> > +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,38)
> 
> Given that the PV drivers must be building fine for SLE11 SP2, which
> is 3.0-based, I wonder if this really is the correct fix (and doesn't
> rather break the build). The first thing coming to mind is that
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h shouldn't get included here
> (and hence there shouldn't be any conflict). Are you perhaps trying
> to build the PV drivers against a pv-ops-enabled configuration (which
> is a wrong to try afaict)?

Its an ordinary kernel-source tree.

git describe d9b8ca8474fd4fdd43ba6d97a4fee8b49b978067
v2.6.37-rc5-2-gd9b8ca8

The function appears in 2.6.38, so I think the version number is correct.

Olaf