From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753368Ab2AWRcK (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:32:10 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49828 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751109Ab2AWRcI (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:32:08 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:31:00 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Dima Zavin Cc: Kashyap Gada , rebecca@android.com, rschultz@google.com, jgennis@google.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Staging: android: Add KERN_ facility level in printk () in pmem.c Message-ID: <20120123173100.GA26943@suse.de> References: <1327116249-18274-1-git-send-email-gada.kashyap@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:22:27AM -0800, Dima Zavin wrote: > We really should just get rid of pmem.c altogether. We will remove it > from our android common tree too. We don't actually use it anymore in > any of our products. There are some legacy users of it, like Qualcomm, > but I'm sure they have a bunch of patches on top of it and thus are > maintaining it separately anyway. Ok, I'll be glad to drop it if you all don't use it anymore and it's not needed. That makes life a lot easier for me :) thanks, greg k-h