From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko =?iso-8859-15?q?St=FCbner?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] S3C2443: add power domain for usb phy Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:09:48 +0100 Message-ID: <201201241109.48749.heiko@sntech.de> References: <201201082156.44142.heiko@sntech.de> <201201241050.14405.heiko@sntech.de> <20120124095130.GA27414@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from h1778886.stratoserver.net ([85.214.133.74]:60326 "EHLO h1778886.stratoserver.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751956Ab2AXKKA convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 05:10:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20120124095130.GA27414@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: balbi@ti.com, Kukjin Kim Cc: 'Ben Dooks' , Linux USB Mailing List , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012, 10:51:31 schrieb Felipe Balbi: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:50:14AM +0100, Heiko St=FCbner wrote: > > Hi Felipe, > >=20 > > Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012, 10:38:32 schrieb Felipe Balbi: > > > Hi, > > >=20 > > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 09:59:02PM +0100, Heiko St=FCbner wrote: > > > > The phy-power-handling is common to S3C2443/2416/2450, so intro= duce a > > > > s3c2443-pm-common.c to handle this for all of them. > > > >=20 > > > > This makes it possible to remove the raw write to the PWRCFG-re= gister > > > > from the s3c-hsudc driver. > > > >=20 > > > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner > > >=20 > > > I believe this doesn't really depend on previous patches (??) In = that > >=20 > > > case, it can be carried with s3c's tree: > > it does depend on the previous patch [2/3], as the device power dom= ain is > > controlled through the runtime-pm subsystem whose calls were added = in it. >=20 > then I will need proper acks to carry this patch. ok, I will pester Kukjin Kim more about it to get the needed ack :-) . If changes are requested to this third patch should I only resubmit thi= s one=20 or all of them again - i.e. will you still keep the first two patches? Heiko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko =?iso-8859-15?q?St=FCbner?=) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:09:48 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] S3C2443: add power domain for usb phy In-Reply-To: <20120124095130.GA27414@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> References: <201201082156.44142.heiko@sntech.de> <201201241050.14405.heiko@sntech.de> <20120124095130.GA27414@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> Message-ID: <201201241109.48749.heiko@sntech.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012, 10:51:31 schrieb Felipe Balbi: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:50:14AM +0100, Heiko St?bner wrote: > > Hi Felipe, > > > > Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012, 10:38:32 schrieb Felipe Balbi: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 09:59:02PM +0100, Heiko St?bner wrote: > > > > The phy-power-handling is common to S3C2443/2416/2450, so introduce a > > > > s3c2443-pm-common.c to handle this for all of them. > > > > > > > > This makes it possible to remove the raw write to the PWRCFG-register > > > > from the s3c-hsudc driver. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner > > > > > > I believe this doesn't really depend on previous patches (??) In that > > > > > case, it can be carried with s3c's tree: > > it does depend on the previous patch [2/3], as the device power domain is > > controlled through the runtime-pm subsystem whose calls were added in it. > > then I will need proper acks to carry this patch. ok, I will pester Kukjin Kim more about it to get the needed ack :-) . If changes are requested to this third patch should I only resubmit this one or all of them again - i.e. will you still keep the first two patches? Heiko