From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:09:24 +0100 Subject: LPC32xx status (Re: [PATCH] Correct bad gpio naming) In-Reply-To: <4F1F16A8.7010407@antcom.de> References: <4F1C4E25.6070801@antcom.de> <20120124155921.GH2609@pengutronix.de> <4F1EDD15.7010704@antcom.de> <20120124192545.GB8502@pengutronix.de> <4F1F16A8.7010407@antcom.de> Message-ID: <20120124210924.GD8502@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > Unfortunately, I currently don't have a phy3250, but can check > tomorrow with colleagues. Shouldn't matter that much, or? Once the core support is back and works for your board, others could test with their boards. > I guess the work92105_defconfig is only useful once the drivers > currently missing in mainline are merged. Or is there an arm specific > tree I should update from? You can keep the work92105_defconfig in your tree, but we'd need to introduce a lpc32xx_defconfig. That should start with a minimal (but working) config and can be extended once the drivers are in place. Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757489Ab2AXVJk (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:09:40 -0500 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:33672 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755844Ab2AXVJj (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:09:39 -0500 Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:09:24 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Roland Stigge Cc: linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kevin Wells Subject: Re: LPC32xx status (Re: [PATCH] Correct bad gpio naming) Message-ID: <20120124210924.GD8502@pengutronix.de> References: <4F1C4E25.6070801@antcom.de> <20120124155921.GH2609@pengutronix.de> <4F1EDD15.7010704@antcom.de> <20120124192545.GB8502@pengutronix.de> <4F1F16A8.7010407@antcom.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wLAMOaPNJ0fu1fTG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F1F16A8.7010407@antcom.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:215:17ff:fe12:23b0 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: wsa@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --wLAMOaPNJ0fu1fTG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Unfortunately, I currently don't have a phy3250, but can check > tomorrow with colleagues. Shouldn't matter that much, or? Once the core support is back and works for your board, others could test with their boards. > I guess the work92105_defconfig is only useful once the drivers > currently missing in mainline are merged. Or is there an arm specific > tree I should update from? You can keep the work92105_defconfig in your tree, but we'd need to introdu= ce a lpc32xx_defconfig. That should start with a minimal (but working) config and can be extended once the drivers are in place. Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --wLAMOaPNJ0fu1fTG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk8fHgQACgkQD27XaX1/VRsoRgCffgo9rwt65Bl7sZKk5hQ23OCj jzMAn2GhgA27GFLYOWzDG5tl8uMq1vJY =c6pk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wLAMOaPNJ0fu1fTG--