From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Robin Dong <hao.bigrat@gmail.com>
Cc: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add new extent structure in ext4
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:48:47 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120125224847.GT15102@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFZ0FUXT-X146SEAHCcNh-bGARUTgLOSP1dCrqeOrT48REN+ow@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 08:51:53PM +0800, Robin Dong wrote:
> Hi Ted, Andreas and the list,
>
> After the bigalloc-feature is completed in ext4, we could have much more
> big size of block-group (also bigger continuous space), but the extent
> structure of files now limit the extent size below 128MB, which is not
> optimal.
>
> We could solve the problem by creating a new extent format to support
> larger extent size, which looks like this:
>
> struct ext4_extent2 {
> __le64 ee_block; /* first logical block extent covers */
> __le64 ee_start; /* starting physical block */
> __le32 ee_len; /* number of blocks covered by extent */
> __le32 ee_flags; /* flags and future extension */
> };
>
> struct ext4_extent2_idx {
> __le64 ei_block; /* index covers logical blocks from 'block' */
> __le64 ei_leaf; /* pointer to the physical block of the next level */
> __le32 ei_flags; /* flags and future extension */
> __le32 ei_unused; /* padding */
> };
>
> I think we could keep the structure of ext4_extent_header and add new
> imcompat flag EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENTS2.
>
> The new extent format could support 16TB continuous space and larger volumes.
>
> What's your opinion?
Just use XFS.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-25 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-23 12:51 [RFC] Add new extent structure in ext4 Robin Dong
2012-01-23 18:59 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-01-23 23:17 ` Andreas Dilger
2012-01-24 13:34 ` Jan Kara
2012-01-24 17:32 ` Andreas Dilger
2012-01-25 22:48 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-01-25 23:03 ` Andreas Dilger
2012-01-27 0:19 ` Dave Chinner
2012-01-27 14:27 ` Tao Ma
2012-01-29 22:07 ` Dave Chinner
2012-01-30 22:50 ` Andreas Dilger
2012-01-30 23:52 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-02-01 3:57 ` Dave Chinner
2012-01-30 20:41 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-01-30 22:52 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120125224847.GT15102@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=hao.bigrat@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.