From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: XFS for-next branch Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:26:02 +1100 Message-ID: <20120127002602.GC15102@dastard> References: <20120125171244.GX8262@sgi.com> <20120127110533.10304c6a33b83ac8e778915c@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120127110533.10304c6a33b83ac8e778915c@canb.auug.org.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, Ben Myers , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:05:33AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:12:44 -0600 Ben Myers wrote: > > > > Could you pull XFS updates from > > > > git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git for-next > > > > instead of from the oss/master branch for 3.3? > > OK, currently I fetch the "master" branch of that tree. And you want em > to switch to the "for-next" branch, right? (Those two branches currently > point to the same commit, so I have not changed yet.) > > Did you mean "3.3", or "3.4"? > > Currently the contacts for that tree are: David Chinner > , xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com. Should I change that? > i.e. who has control over the tree and can fix problems if I report them? I'd suggest changing the xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com address to just the xfs list (xfs@oss.sgi.com) as more people will see it that way. You can leave my email address there if you want because I'm in the same timezone as you, Stephen. Ben is the only person that can manipulate the tree, though, so you probably should add him to the list, too. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs