From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: greg@kroah.com (Greg KH)
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:56:35 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] ux500: Export SoC information and some platform
 clean-up
In-Reply-To: <201201261520.43176.arnd@arndb.de>
References: <1327165687-4223-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>
 <201201251501.42304.arnd@arndb.de> <4F2038E8.8090209@linaro.org>
 <201201261520.43176.arnd@arndb.de>
Message-ID: <20120127005635.GA32478@kroah.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 03:20:43PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> > >>> Everyone else, who is planning to use the infrastructure besides ux500?
> > >>
> > >> I can easily see this being used in the ARM reference designs
> > >> (Integrator, Versatile, RealView and Versatile Express) some of them
> > >> I can possibly patch myself even. OMAP has expressed interest
> > >> in "some way of getting the SoC ID out", and I guess this is
> > >> the means to that end.
> > > 
> > > Ah, good. Once these patches are merged, we can easily refer anyone
> > > to this infrastructure if they try to add a different way of finding
> > > a SoC ID.
> > 
> > Okay, so this sounds promising. Which route are the patches likely to
> > take? Will they go up through your SoC tree Arnd?
> 
> That's probably the best way. Of course you need to have Acks
> from Greg (for the bus) and Linus Walleij (for the ux500 stuff)
> before I can merge them. Linus can decide whether he wants to
> submit them to me through a pull request from his ux500 tree
> (with Signed-off-by) or whether I should apply them myself
> (with Ack).

I'll try to review these again tomorrow...