From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net (vms173005pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.5]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE462E0072A for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:09:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.163.124.23]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LYH002W63ZNYUX1@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net> for meta-ti@yoctoproject.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:09:23 -0600 (CST) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 08352202E0; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:09:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:09:22 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Koen Kooi Message-id: <20120127200922.GC8707@denix.org> References: <1327603585-5599-1-git-send-email-Chase.Maupin@ti.com> <4F21D735.5000303@ti.com> <27324814-C581-4BD9-92DF-68FC5CB4CECF@dominion.thruhere.net> <20120127193923.GB8707@denix.org> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] matrix-gui-browser: port from arago overlay X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:09:50 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 08:47:29PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 27 jan. 2012, om 20:39 heeft Denys Dmytriyenko het volgende geschreven: > > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 01:24:14PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> > >> Op 27 jan. 2012, om 13:09 heeft Andreas M?ller het volgende geschreven: > >> > >>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Koen Kooi > >>> wrote: > >>>> Since meta-arago is supposed to be as empty as possible and matrix > >>>> doesn't play well with others it's a bad fit for both meta-arago and > >>>> meta-oe. Maybe we should split the meta-ti repo into 2 layers: one for > >>>> BSP things (including sgx, dsp, etc) and one for 'sdk' things (matrix). > >>>> The idea is to keep reusable TI deliverables together without forcing > >>>> people to use arago. Putting matrix in meta-arago would mean you can only > >>>> use it with DISTRO=arago, which is a huge step backwards from the current > >>>> situation. > >>> > >>> I think splitting out BSP into an own layer is a good idea and sorry > >>> for another hijacking: This would be a good chance to make it > >>> independent of angstrom ( e.g ti-hw-bringup ). > >> > >> Image reuse is the least of the issues, SOC_FAMILY is a much larger one. > > > > Koen, > > > > Can you please elaborate on the SOC_FAMILY issue you mentioned? Thanks. > > We need support for it, only angstrom does at the moment. The big problem is > that the solution can't be layer-local since other layers will use it as > well. Having duplicates in OVERRIDES is a nightmare. Adding SOC_FAMILY into MACHINEOVERRIDES portion of OVERRIDES and making sure sstate recognizes it... Why not push this change to OE-Core? -- Denys