From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173011pub.verizon.net (vms173011pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.11]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A99DE0072A for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:11:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.163.124.23]) by vms173011.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LYH0032T434UXU0@vms173011.mailsrvcs.net> for meta-ti@yoctoproject.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:11:29 -0600 (CST) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1104B202E0; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:11:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:11:27 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Tom Rini Message-id: <20120127201127.GD8707@denix.org> References: <1327603585-5599-1-git-send-email-Chase.Maupin@ti.com> <4F21D735.5000303@ti.com> <27324814-C581-4BD9-92DF-68FC5CB4CECF@dominion.thruhere.net> <7D46E86EC0A8354091174257B2FED1010BF9BA72@DLEE12.ent.ti.com> <4F22E41B.8070708@ti.com> <7D46E86EC0A8354091174257B2FED1010BF9D77A@DLEE12.ent.ti.com> <4F2302F8.1000307@ti.com> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: "meta-ti@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] matrix-gui-browser: port from arago overlay X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:11:44 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-disposition: inline Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 01:10:22PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:03 PM, William Mills wrote: > > OK this part is off list. > > > > Go look at meta-intel and then look at the meta-ti your guys are purposing. > >   Now, your an engineer in a hurry and you need to choose between intel ATOM > > and TI ARM.  Which one looks simpler, clearer, and well organized.  Which do > > you want to use? > > The problem we have here is that one of them (meta-intel) is "just use > poky and this" and one of them is "just use angstrom and meta-oe and > this". And we need to figure out which use cases we want to support, > and how. "Just use poky and this" is also a valid use case for us. -- Denys