From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173017pub.verizon.net (vms173017pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.17]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45DDCE00599 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:24:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.163.124.23]) by vms173017.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LYH00C484O1LKF2@vms173017.mailsrvcs.net> for meta-ti@yoctoproject.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:24:01 -0600 (CST) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 481AF202E0; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:24:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:24:01 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Philip Balister Message-id: <20120127202401.GF8707@denix.org> References: <1327603585-5599-1-git-send-email-Chase.Maupin@ti.com> <4F21D735.5000303@ti.com> <27324814-C581-4BD9-92DF-68FC5CB4CECF@dominion.thruhere.net> <7D46E86EC0A8354091174257B2FED1010BF9BA72@DLEE12.ent.ti.com> <4F22E41B.8070708@ti.com> <7D46E86EC0A8354091174257B2FED1010BF9D77A@DLEE12.ent.ti.com> <4F2302F8.1000307@ti.com> <20120127201127.GD8707@denix.org> <4F2306E8.4010306@balister.org> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <4F2306E8.4010306@balister.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: "meta-ti@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] matrix-gui-browser: port from arago overlay X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:24:02 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 03:19:52PM -0500, Philip Balister wrote: > On 01/27/2012 03:11 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 01:10:22PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:03 PM, William Mills wrote: > >>> OK this part is off list. > >>> > >>> Go look at meta-intel and then look at the meta-ti your guys are purposing. > >>> Now, your an engineer in a hurry and you need to choose between intel ATOM > >>> and TI ARM. Which one looks simpler, clearer, and well organized. Which do > >>> you want to use? > >> > >> The problem we have here is that one of them (meta-intel) is "just use > >> poky and this" and one of them is "just use angstrom and meta-oe and > >> this". And we need to figure out which use cases we want to support, > >> and how. > > > > "Just use poky and this" is also a valid use case for us. > > > > But not for me. I need recipes from meta-oe to ship USRP-E100's and it > is nice having binary feeds available for customer use. (Angstrom adds > binary feeds to the mix). It always possible to add-on stuff. But it's not so easy to remove. Remember how awfully huge and messy Classic OE was... Layers were supposed to fix that! -- Denys