From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net (vms173005pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.5]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6B6E00599 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:34:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.163.124.23]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LYH00IOK55MI1B2@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net> for meta-ti@yoctoproject.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:34:35 -0600 (CST) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 791B2202E0; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:34:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:34:33 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: "Maupin, Chase" Message-id: <20120127203433.GG8707@denix.org> References: <4F21D735.5000303@ti.com> <27324814-C581-4BD9-92DF-68FC5CB4CECF@dominion.thruhere.net> <7D46E86EC0A8354091174257B2FED1010BF9BA72@DLEE12.ent.ti.com> <4F22E41B.8070708@ti.com> <7D46E86EC0A8354091174257B2FED1010BF9D77A@DLEE12.ent.ti.com> <4F2304E7.7070809@ti.com> <7D46E86EC0A8354091174257B2FED1010BF9D879@DLEE12.ent.ti.com> <20120127202150.GE8707@denix.org> <4F230803.1070503@ti.com> <7D46E86EC0A8354091174257B2FED1010BF9D92A@DLEE12.ent.ti.com> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <7D46E86EC0A8354091174257B2FED1010BF9D92A@DLEE12.ent.ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: "meta-ti@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] matrix-gui-browser: port from arago overlay X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:34:35 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 08:29:42PM +0000, Maupin, Chase wrote: > > > I don't think that was Bill's message. It was simplicity. BSP > > only layer, no > > > supplemental apps, if not absolutely required. > > > > > > Your example with lmbench is not correct - BSP layer should be > > simple enough > > > to be used with OE-Core alone to produce a console rootfs image > > with nothing > > > but busybox. > > > > > > How about splitting meta-ti into: > > > * BSP only > > > * SGX graphics > > > * DSP tools > > > * WiFi etc. > > > > > > And then splitting meta-arago into: > > > * Arago distro for TI SDKs > > > * Supplemental apps > > > > > > > Need to get my "YES!" in here before everyone barfs all over the > > proposal :) > > I'm good with this. I was also planning in meta-arago to at least put all > bbappends in a recipes-appends directory so it was easy to track the things > we are "tweaking" vs. the recipes. Arago today is too much of a mix between > amends and recipes in my opinion. I would even say that Tom's proposal > (from IRC) of splitting the arago distro and supplemental apps into two > layers would be a good idea so that other distros can pull our supplemental > apps if they want pretty easily. And that way we don?t keep adding more > repos to manage. Actually that was my proposal (and Bill's offline), but never mind :) As of today's state of Arago - if you don't count recipes/ti, which was "untouchable" for some special reasons, everything else is quite clean with using amends everywhere possible! And our of all the people you should know this better. -- Denys