From: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kay.sievers@vrfy.org, bp@amd64.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: WARN... Device 'cpu1' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed. when doing 'xl vcpu-set <guest_id> 1'
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:22:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201201291022.09258.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120123180601.GA24553@phenom.dumpdata.com>
I created a Bugzilla entry at
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42683
for your bug report, please add your address to the CC list in there, thanks!
On poniedziałek, 23 stycznia 2012 o 19:06:01 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> When I bring a CPU down in a guest (which should be the same as bringing a
> CPU down using the ACPI framework), I get this:
>
> [ 14.484206] SMP alternatives: switching to UP code
> [ 14.514287] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 14.514318] WARNING: at /home/konrad/linux-linus/drivers/base/core.c:194
> device_release+0x82/0x90() [ 14.514354] Device 'cpu1' does not have a
> release() function, it is broken and must be fixed. [ 14.514386] Modules
> linked in: radeon fbcon tileblit font ttm bitblit softcursor
> drm_kms_helper xen_blkfront xen_netfront xen_fbfront fb_sys_fops sysimgblt
> sysfillrect syscopyarea xen_kbdfront xenfs xen_privcmd [ 14.514557] Pid:
> 22, comm: xenwatch Not tainted 3.3.0-rc1 #1
> [ 14.514586] Call Trace:
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff810897fa>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7a/0xb0
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff810898d1>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x41/0x50
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff813dea02>] device_release+0x82/0x90
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff812dfb85>] kobject_release+0x45/0x90
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff812dfa4c>] kobject_put+0x2c/0x60
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff813de6a2>] put_device+0x12/0x20
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff813df409>] device_unregister+0x19/0x20
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff813e4edf>] unregister_cpu+0x4f/0x80
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff81052c7c>] arch_unregister_cpu+0x1c/0x20
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff8137f787>] handle_vcpu_hotplug_event+0xc7/0xd0
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff8137b900>] xenwatch_thread+0xb0/0x180
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff810ad3f0>] ? wake_up_bit+0x40/0x40
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff8137b850>] ? split+0xf0/0xf0
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff810acd16>] kthread+0x96/0xa0
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff816151e4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff8160cc80>] ? retint_restore_args+0x5/0x6
> [ 14.515094] [<ffffffff816151e0>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
> [ 14.515094] ---[ end trace 8f70af51a2e2611f ]---
>
> Looking at "commit e032d80774315869aa2285b217fdbbfed86c0b49
> Author: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
> Date: Mon Jan 16 14:40:28 2012 -0800
>
> mce: fix warning messages about static struct mce_device
> "
>
> it looks like the corret fix is to make the 'cpu_devices' in
> arch/x86/kernel/topology.c to be changed to be more dynamic
> (or perhaps have an empty release function)?
>
> Is anybody else hitting this with ACPI CPU hot-unplug? Or do I have
> the privilige of being the first? Oh, I hadn't done a full bisection
> but v3.2 does not have this.
>
> The guest config is quite simple:
> extra="console=hvc0 debug earlyprintk=xen memblock=debug"
> kernel="/mnt/lab/bootstrap-x86_64/vmlinuz"
> ramdisk="/mnt/lab/bootstrap-x86_64/initramfs.cpio.gz"
> memory=1024
> maxmem=2048
> vcpus=2
> name="bootstrap-x86_64"
> on_crash="preserve"
> vfb = [ 'vnc=1, vnclisten=0.0.0.0,vncunused=1']
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Maciej Rutecki
http://www.mrutecki.pl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-29 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-23 18:06 WARN... Device 'cpu1' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed. when doing 'xl vcpu-set <guest_id> 1' Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-01-23 18:13 ` Greg KH
2012-01-27 0:06 ` Greg KH
2012-01-27 0:22 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-27 0:53 ` Greg KH
2012-01-29 9:22 ` Maciej Rutecki [this message]
2012-02-01 22:22 ` Greg KH
2012-02-02 17:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-02-02 18:38 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201201291022.09258.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com \
--to=maciej.rutecki@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.