From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Rob Herring" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
"Paul Brook" <paul@codesourcery.com>,
"Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>,
"Jeremy Kerr" <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] arm: add device tree support
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 06:33:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120130133352.GG28397@ponder.secretlab.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9YKLG68EUY53qb6Z=burW5Ex4G6dCFTLNZXuckm0zp=A@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 09:29:58PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 29 January 2012 18:48, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
> > Am 29.01.2012 17:01, schrieb Grant Likely:
> >> Okay, well at least let's start with this. Here is an updated version of the
> >> patch that doesn't touch the board code. It makes the -dtb option available
> >> to all ARM platforms.
> >>
> >> Even if dtb is not the primary structure, we absolutely need this option.
> >
> > Well, the option itself is what has been the most controversial here.
> > Yours is at least the third attempt, so far we've seen discussed -dtb,
> > -kern-dtb, -kernel-dtb, -kernel dtb=, etc.
>
> FWIW, my vote is for '-dtb' because it parallels the existing -initrd
> and -append. (Or -devicetree if we think -dtb is too cryptic; but anyway
> not something with 'kernel' in it.)
That was my reasoning too. I'm not stuck on any particular flag though as
long as the feature gets merged. :-)
g.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-30 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-27 21:53 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] arm: add device tree support Grant Likely
2012-01-27 22:34 ` Paul Brook
2012-01-28 18:48 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-29 11:15 ` Paul Brook
2012-01-29 16:01 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-29 18:48 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-29 21:29 ` Peter Maydell
2012-01-30 13:33 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2012-01-29 19:13 ` Peter Maydell
2012-01-29 20:36 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-30 11:36 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-30 13:31 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-30 0:24 ` John Williams
2012-01-29 20:42 ` Edgar E. Iglesias
2012-01-29 23:54 ` Peter Crosthwaite
2012-01-30 13:40 ` Grant Likely
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-01-29 7:48 Peter Crosthwaite
2012-02-22 19:48 Peter Maydell
2012-02-27 17:38 Peter Maydell
2012-02-27 17:41 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120130133352.GG28397@ponder.secretlab.ca \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
--cc=jeremy.kerr@canonical.com \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.