All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <wfg@linux.intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
	Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
Subject: Re: Bad SSD performance with recent kernels
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:05:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120130140537.GA20349@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120130140109.GA15682@localhost>

> - IO size is 256KB (which is not a problem in itself)
> 
> - The dispatch/complete pattern is
> 
>         submit IO for range 1
>         complete IO for range 1
>         <dd busy, disk idle>
>         submit IO for range 2
>         complete IO for range 2
> 
>   So we have periods that no IO is in flight at all, which leads to
>   under-utilized disk (which should show up in iostat as <100% disk util)
> 
> # grep '[DC]' blktrace
> 
>   8,16   1   770606     9.990039807  4580  D   R 4379392 + 512 (   14826) [dd]
>   8,16   1   770607     9.991083069     0  C   R 4379392 + 512 ( 1043262) [0]
> 
>   8,16   1   770739     9.991647434  4580  D   R 4379904 + 512 (   14433) [dd]
>   8,16   1   770740     9.992693317     0  C   R 4379904 + 512 ( 1045883) [0]
> 
>   8,16   1   770872     9.993256451  4580  D   R 4380416 + 512 (   14539) [dd]
>   8,16   1   770873     9.994299156     0  C   R 4380416 + 512 ( 1042705) [0]
> 
>   8,16   1   771005     9.994863680  4580  D   R 4380928 + 512 (   14344) [dd]
>   8,16   1   771006     9.995909291     0  C   R 4380928 + 512 ( 1045611) [0]
> 
>   8,16   1   771138     9.996470460  4580  D   R 4381440 + 512 (   14043) [dd]
>   8,16   1   771139     9.997514205     0  C   R 4381440 + 512 ( 1043745) [0]
> 
>   8,16   1   771271     9.998077269  4580  D   R 4381952 + 512 (   14928) [dd]
>   8,16   1   771272     9.999120396     0  C   R 4381952 + 512 ( 1043127) [0]

Some better pattern for comparison:

  8,0    1    42940     0.990199812  4084  D   R 1432808 + 256 [dd]
  8,0    1    42941     0.990858326     0  C   R 1432552 + 256 [0]
  8,0    1    43009     0.991192107  4084  D   R 1433064 + 256 [dd]
  8,0    3    14691     0.991853319     0  C   R 1432808 + 256 [0]
  8,0    3    14759     0.992189451  4084  D   R 1433320 + 256 [dd]
  8,0    1    43010     0.994473159     0  C   R 1433064 + 256 [0]

Where the life time for requests 1432808, 1432552, 1433064, ...
are *interleaved* so that the disk always has something to do.

Thanks,
Fengguang

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-30 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-27  6:00 Bad SSD performance with recent kernels Herbert Poetzl
2012-01-27  6:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-28 12:51 ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-28 13:33   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-29  5:59     ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-29  8:42       ` Herbert Poetzl
2012-01-29  9:28         ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-29 10:03       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-29 11:16         ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-29 13:13           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-29 15:52             ` Pádraig Brady
2012-01-29 16:10             ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-29 20:15               ` Herbert Poetzl
2012-01-30 11:18                 ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-30 12:34                   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-30 14:01                     ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-30 14:05                       ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2012-01-30  3:17               ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-30  5:31                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-30  5:45                   ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-30  7:13                 ` Herbert Poetzl
2012-01-30  7:22                   ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-30  7:36                     ` Herbert Poetzl
2012-01-30  8:12                       ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-30 10:31                         ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-30 14:28                           ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-30 14:51                             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-30 22:26                               ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-31  0:14                                 ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-31  1:07                                   ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-31  3:00                                     ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-31  2:17                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-31  8:46                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-31  6:36                             ` Herbert Poetzl
2012-01-30 14:48         ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-28 17:01   ` Herbert Poetzl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120130140537.GA20349@localhost \
    --to=wfg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.