All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Enke Chen <enkechen@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [RFCv7 PATCH 0/4] Add poll_requested_events() function.
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 14:48:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120202144823.ce00767d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1328178417-3876-1-git-send-email-hverkuil@xs4all.nl>

On Thu,  2 Feb 2012 11:26:53 +0100
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> wrote:

> The first version of this patch was posted July 1st, 2011. I really hope that
> it won't take another six months to get a review from a fs developer. As this
> LWN article (http://lwn.net/Articles/450658/) said: 'There has been little
> discussion of the patch; it doesn't seem like there is any real reason for it
> not to go in for 3.1.'
> 
> The earliest this can go in now is 3.4. The only reason it takes so long is
> that it has been almost impossible to get a Ack or comments or even just a
> simple reply from the fs developers. That is really frustrating, I'm sorry
> to say.

Yup.  Nobody really maintains the poll/select code.  It happens to sit
under fs/ so nominally belongs to the "fs maintainers".  The logs for
fs/select.c seem to show me as the usual committer, but I wouldn't
claim particular expertise in this area - I'm more a tube-unclogger
here.  Probably Al knows the code as well or better than anyone else. 
It's good that he looked at an earlier version of the patches.

fs/eventpoll.c has an identified maintainer, but he has been vigorously
hiding from us for a year or so.  I'm the commit monkey for eventpoll,
in a similar state to fs/select.c.

So ho hum, all we can do is our best.  You're an experienced kernel
developer who has put a lot of work into the code.  I suggest that you
get your preferred version into linux-next ASAP then send Linus a pull
request for 3.4-rc1, explaining the situation.  If the code wasn't
already in linux-next I would put it in -mm today, for 3.4-rc1.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-02 22:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-02 10:26 [RFCv7 PATCH 0/4] Add poll_requested_events() function Hans Verkuil
2012-02-02 10:26 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 1/4] eventpoll: set key to the correct events mask Hans Verkuil
2012-02-02 10:26   ` [RFCv7 PATCH 2/4] poll: add poll_requested_events() and poll_does_not_wait() functions Hans Verkuil
2012-02-02 22:48     ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-02 10:26   ` [RFCv7 PATCH 3/4] net/sock.h: use poll_does_not_wait() in sock_poll_wait() Hans Verkuil
2012-02-02 10:26   ` [RFCv7 PATCH 4/4] unix/af_unix.c: use poll_requested_events() in unix_dgram_poll() Hans Verkuil
2012-02-02 22:48 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-02-03  9:30   ` [RFCv7 PATCH 0/4] Add poll_requested_events() function Hans Verkuil
2012-02-03  1:58 ` Enke Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120202144823.ce00767d.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=enkechen@cisco.com \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.