Re: [patch cr 2/4] [RFC] syscalls, x86: Add __NR_kcmp syscall v7

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> wrote:

> > > +			get_random_bytes(&cookies[i][j],
> > > +					 sizeof(cookies[i][j]));
> > 
> > ugly line break.
> > 
> 
> Why? Looks pretty good to me. But sure I'll change it.

It's ugly because it serves no purpose other than pacifying 
checkpatch and makes the code *uglier*.

It's a disease. When checkpatch tells you "this line is too 
long" then consider it a code cleanliness warning!

		And code
	readability and cleanliness
		is not improved
	by random line-
		breaks, right?

'breaking the line' is the *wrong fix* in roughly 90% of the 
cases.

So instead of dumbly breaking the line you need to think about 
*WHY* the line got too long, not just mechanically work around 
the checkpatch warning!

Too long lines can have many reasons, it's usually one of 
several reasons:

     - too much nesting due to too large function.
       solution: break up the function
 or: - too verbose statements with not enough abbreviation
       solution: find a more compact way to write it

or if the code looks compact enough and is not over-nested then 
*leave the line alone*. By breaking it you have not improved - 
you have made it worse.

Thanks,

	Ingo