From: Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com>
To: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Performance problem - reads slower than writes
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 22:10:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120203221015.GA2675@nsrc.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F2C38BE.2010002@hardwarefreak.com>
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:42:54PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> You've hit the peak read rate of these Hitachi drives. As others
> pointed out, if you need more read performance than the dozen of these
> you plan to RAID stripe, then you'll need to swap them for units with a
> faster spindle:
>
> 7.2k 1.21x
> 10k 1.68x
> 15k 2.53x
>
> or with SSDs, which will yield an order of magnitude increase. Your
> stated need is 20M 500-800KB files, or 20GB if my math is correct.
Thanks for your suggestion, but unfortunately your maths isn't correct: 20M
x 0.65MB = 13TB. And that's just one of many possible datasets like this.
I'm aware that I'm working with low-performance drives. This is intentional:
we need low power consumption so we can get lots in a rack, and large
capacity at low cost.
Fortunately our workload will also parallelise easily, and throwing it
across 24 spindles will be fine. But obviously I want to squeeze the most
performance out of each spindle we have first. I'm very happy to have found
the bottleneck that was troubling me :-)
Regards,
Brian.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-03 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-30 22:00 Performance problem - reads slower than writes Brian Candler
2012-01-31 2:05 ` Dave Chinner
2012-01-31 10:31 ` Brian Candler
2012-01-31 14:16 ` Brian Candler
2012-01-31 20:25 ` Dave Chinner
2012-02-01 7:29 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-02-03 18:47 ` Brian Candler
2012-02-03 19:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-03 21:01 ` Brian Candler
2012-02-03 21:17 ` Brian Candler
2012-02-05 22:50 ` Dave Chinner
2012-02-05 22:43 ` Dave Chinner
2012-01-31 14:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-31 21:52 ` Brian Candler
2012-02-01 0:50 ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2012-02-01 3:59 ` Dave Chinner
2012-02-03 11:54 ` Brian Candler
2012-02-03 19:42 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-02-03 22:10 ` Brian Candler [this message]
2012-02-04 9:59 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-02-04 11:24 ` Brian Candler
2012-02-04 12:49 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-02-04 20:04 ` Brian Candler
2012-02-04 20:44 ` Joe Landman
2012-02-06 10:40 ` Brian Candler
2012-02-07 17:30 ` Brian Candler
2012-02-05 5:16 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-02-05 9:05 ` Brian Candler
2012-01-31 20:06 ` Dave Chinner
2012-01-31 21:35 ` Brian Candler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120203221015.GA2675@nsrc.org \
--to=b.candler@pobox.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.