From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755580Ab2BFShB (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2012 13:37:01 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:59458 "EHLO out5-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751121Ab2BFShA (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2012 13:37:00 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: bnXOPM3CGTF1YMnbbD1iiTWvQjcOJEMbc/7GXra6otwQ 1328553419 Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:29:56 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kobject (ffff88003ffbb4b8): tried to init an initialized object, something is seriously wrong. Message-ID: <20120206182956.GA13819@kroah.com> References: <20120203205953.GA2897@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20120203213949.GC8196@kroah.com> <20120203214235.GA10549@kroah.com> <20120206182040.GA1862@phenom.dumpdata.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120206182040.GA1862@phenom.dumpdata.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 01:20:40PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:42:35PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:39:49PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 03:59:53PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > > Hey Greg, > > > > > > > > With or without your previous patch (the one that added an cpu_device_release > > > > function) I am getting this in 3.3-rc2. I did not get this in 3.2. > > > > > > > > I added some extra printks to make sure that the handle_vcpu_hotplug_event > > > > code actually did call 'arch_unregister_cpu' which is certainly looks > > > > to be doing. > > > > > > > > I hadn't done a bisection yet, but was wondering if this is related > > > > to the previous issues with the sysdev. Or kobject getting more observant. > > > > > > No, it's related to the previous issue, let me knock up a patch to fix > > > this as well... > > > > Does this patch solve the problem for you? > > Yeah, no warnings. But neither is the CPU coming back up :-( Very wierd. > Thought that might be related to something else - let me double check > with 3.2 whether there are some race-conditions that I might be hitting. Ok, I'll wait to queue this up until you get back to me. greg k-h