All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Shaohua Li <vivek.goyal2008@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de>,
	mroos@linux.ee
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: strip out locking optimization in put_io_context()
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 09:17:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120207171715.GI21292@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120207164735.GH21292@google.com>

On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 08:47:35AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Yeah, I was about to ask Shaohua to test the version w/o optimization.
> With heavily loaded request_queue, trylock failure could be frequent,
> which I wasn't testing.
> 
> Shaohua, can you please test the version w/o optimization?  Also, can
> you please give a bit more details on the setup?  Are there multiple
> swap devices?  Is it SSD or rotating disk?

Can you please also apply the following patch on top of
block/for-linus and see how it behaves?

Thanks.
---
 block/blk-ioc.c |   54 +++++++++++++++++-------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

Index: work/block/blk-ioc.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/block/blk-ioc.c
+++ work/block/blk-ioc.c
@@ -79,52 +79,32 @@ static void ioc_release_fn(struct work_s
 {
 	struct io_context *ioc = container_of(work, struct io_context,
 					      release_work);
-	struct request_queue *last_q = NULL;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&ioc->lock);
+	/*
+	 * Exiting icq may call into put_io_context() through elevator
+	 * which will trigger lockdep warning.  The ioc's are guaranteed to
+	 * be different, use a different locking subclass here.  Using
+	 * irqsave variant as there's no spin_lock_irq_nested().
+	 */
+	spin_lock_irqsave_nested(&ioc->lock, flags, 1);
 
 	while (!hlist_empty(&ioc->icq_list)) {
 		struct io_cq *icq = hlist_entry(ioc->icq_list.first,
 						struct io_cq, ioc_node);
-		struct request_queue *this_q = icq->q;
+		struct request_queue *q = icq->q;
 
-		if (this_q != last_q) {
-			/*
-			 * Need to switch to @this_q.  Once we release
-			 * @ioc->lock, it can go away along with @cic.
-			 * Hold on to it.
-			 */
-			__blk_get_queue(this_q);
-
-			/*
-			 * blk_put_queue() might sleep thanks to kobject
-			 * idiocy.  Always release both locks, put and
-			 * restart.
-			 */
-			if (last_q) {
-				spin_unlock(last_q->queue_lock);
-				spin_unlock_irq(&ioc->lock);
-				blk_put_queue(last_q);
-			} else {
-				spin_unlock_irq(&ioc->lock);
-			}
-
-			last_q = this_q;
-			spin_lock_irq(this_q->queue_lock);
-			spin_lock(&ioc->lock);
-			continue;
+		if (spin_trylock(q->queue_lock)) {
+			ioc_exit_icq(icq);
+			spin_unlock(q->queue_lock);
+		} else {
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioc->lock, flags);
+			cpu_relax();
+			spin_lock_irqsave_nested(&ioc->lock, flags, 1);
 		}
-		ioc_exit_icq(icq);
-	}
-
-	if (last_q) {
-		spin_unlock(last_q->queue_lock);
-		spin_unlock_irq(&ioc->lock);
-		blk_put_queue(last_q);
-	} else {
-		spin_unlock_irq(&ioc->lock);
 	}
 
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioc->lock, flags);
 	kmem_cache_free(iocontext_cachep, ioc);
 }
 

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-07 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-06  7:50 [patch]block: fix ioc locking warning Shaohua Li
2012-02-06  7:55 ` Jens Axboe
2012-02-06 15:12 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-06 16:09   ` Jens Axboe
2012-02-06 16:37     ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-06 16:44       ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-06 16:58         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-06 17:27           ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-06 20:16             ` Jens Axboe
2012-02-06 21:54               ` [PATCH] block: strip out locking optimization in put_io_context() Tejun Heo
2012-02-07  6:49                 ` Jens Axboe
2012-02-07 16:22                   ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-07 16:28                     ` Jens Axboe
2012-02-07 16:33                       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-07 16:47                         ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-07 17:17                           ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-02-08  0:19                           ` Shaohua Li
2012-02-08  8:29                             ` Shaohua Li
2012-02-08 16:29                               ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-08 16:34                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-08 16:49                                   ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-08 16:56                                     ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-08 17:23                                       ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-09  6:22                                 ` Shaohua Li
2012-02-09 17:59                                   ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-09 18:07                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-09 19:24                                       ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-09 23:48                                         ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-10  5:14                                           ` Shaohua Li
2012-02-10  8:48                                             ` Shaohua Li
2012-02-11  2:17                                               ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-11 11:35                                                 ` Jens Axboe
2012-02-13  1:34                                                 ` Shaohua Li
2012-02-13 20:49                                                   ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-14  2:36                                                     ` Shaohua Li
2012-02-14 16:39                                                       ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-10  3:09                                       ` Shaohua Li
2012-02-07 23:00                   ` [PATCH] block: fix lockdep warning on io_context release put_io_context() Tejun Heo
2012-02-06 20:36             ` [patch]block: fix ioc locking warning Tejun Heo
2012-02-07  0:31               ` Shaohua Li
2012-02-07  0:39                 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-07  0:43                   ` Shaohua Li
2012-02-07  0:59                     ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-07  1:10                       ` Shaohua Li
2012-02-07  1:33                         ` Shaohua Li
2012-02-07  5:22                       ` Shaohua Li
2012-02-07 22:34                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-06 16:22 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-08 18:07 ` walt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120207171715.GI21292@google.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=Knut_Petersen@t-online.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mroos@linux.ee \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=vivek.goyal2008@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.