From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757256Ab2BHUKT (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2012 15:10:19 -0500 Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:52468 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755825Ab2BHUKS (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2012 15:10:18 -0500 Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 12:10:08 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Evgeniy Polyakov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: pohmelfs: call for inclusion Message-ID: <20120208201008.GA5578@kroah.com> References: <20120208193413.GA22215@ioremap.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120208193413.GA22215@ioremap.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:34:13PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > But that's enough for advertisement. Here is the code. > I do not know whether it is a good idea to ask it for inclusion into > mainline tree right now skipping drivers/staging part. But anyway, I > post patch to remove drivers/staging/pohmelfs and add fs/pohmelfs > If it is not the way to go, I will resubmit. It would be easiest to just send a patch deleting the old drivers/staging/pohmelfs, or just ask me to do it, which I can, and then send a new patch just with the new code, as it is so different. That should make it easier to review, and also small enough to fit through the mailing list size limits :) thanks, greg k-h