All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Whit Blauvelt <whit@transpect.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WARNING: at kernel/timer.c:1011 del_timer_sync+0x56/0x60() - 3.2.2 - tulip?
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 09:43:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120209144350.GA10609@black.transpect.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120129184437.GA10176@black.transpect.com>

Another instance, in this case with the card becoming non-operational. There
have been several other instances of the kernel halting possibly related. In
any case, stress testing CPU and RAM doesn't reproduce the halt.

Feb  8 19:38:08 whit kernel: [11045.627031] net eth0: (99048) System Error occurred (0)
Feb  8 19:38:08 whit kernel: [11045.627088] net eth0: (99048) System Error occurred (0)
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050016] ------------[ cut here ]------------
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050035] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:255 dev_watchdog+0x262/0x270()
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050041] Hardware name: SK22V10
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050046] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (tulip): transmit queue 0 timed out
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050050] Modules linked in: Modules linked in: binfmt_misc nfsd lockd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc
  exportfs dm_crypt xt_limit autofs4 ipt_REJECT xt_multiport ipt_LOG xt_tcpudp xt_state iptable_filter ip_tables
  nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_conntrack_proto_udplite nf_conntrack_proto_dccp nf_conntrack_tftp speedstep_lib
  nf_conntrack_netbios_ns nf_conntrack_snmp nf_conntrack_broadcast nf_conntrack_proto_sctp nf_conntrack_irc          
  nf_conntrack_sane nf_conntrack_h323 nf_conntrack_pptp kvm_amd nf_conntrack_proto_gre kvm ts_kmp nf_conntrack_netlink
  nfnetlink nf_conntrack_amanda xt_conntrack x_tables nf_conntrack_sip snd_via82xx gameport snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus
  snd_pcm snd_page_alloc snd_mpu401_uart snd_seq_midi snd_rawmidi snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq nf_conntrack_ftp
  nf_conntrack snd_timer snd_seq_device firewire_sbp2 ppdev shpchp lp parport_pc k8temp bridge stp snd soundcore
  i2c_viapro parport edac_core edac_mce_amd e1000e floppy firewire_ohci sata_via via_rhine pata_via firewire_core
  crc_itu_t tulip
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050182] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.2.2-black01 #1
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050186] Call Trace:
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050191]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff81063d8f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050211]  [<ffffffff81063e86>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050220]  [<ffffffff8108d638>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xa8/0x110
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050233]  [<ffffffff814f0f32>] dev_watchdog+0x262/0x270
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050240]  [<ffffffff8105db02>] ? scheduler_tick+0x122/0x280
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050249]  [<ffffffff810740a4>] run_timer_softirq+0x134/0x360
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050256]  [<ffffffff814f0cd0>] ? netif_carrier_off+0x30/0x30
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050265]  [<ffffffff8106b388>] __do_softirq+0xa8/0x1c0
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050274]  [<ffffffff810981f4>] ? tick_program_event+0x24/0x30
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050282]  [<ffffffff815e916c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050292]  [<ffffffff810152b5>] do_softirq+0x65/0xa0
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050299]  [<ffffffff8106b71e>] irq_exit+0x8e/0xb0
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050307]  [<ffffffff815e9b0e>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x99
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050316]  [<ffffffff815e79de>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x80
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050321]  <EOI>  [<ffffffff8103b21b>] ? native_safe_halt+0xb/0x10
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050337]  [<ffffffff8101b9c1>] default_idle+0x41/0xe0
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050344]  [<ffffffff8101babd>] amd_e400_idle+0x5d/0x120
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050351]  [<ffffffff81012276>] cpu_idle+0xd6/0x110
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050362]  [<ffffffff815c1c45>] rest_init+0x75/0x80
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050371]  [<ffffffff81ad7c0a>] start_kernel+0x3b3/0x3be
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050379]  [<ffffffff81ad7347>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x132/0x136
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050386]  [<ffffffff81ad744c>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x101/0x110
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050393] ---[ end trace ff676ffe84ac588c ]---
Feb  8 19:38:19 whit kernel: [11057.050406] net eth0: PNIC2 transmit timed out, status ec69000d, CSR6/7 e7fe42c5 / e7fe42cd CSR12 000000c4, resetting...
Feb  8 19:38:27 whit kernel: [11065.050029] net eth0: PNIC2 transmit timed out, status ec69010f, CSR6/7 e7fe42c5 / e7fe42cd CSR12 000000c4, resetting...

Needless to say, I've swapped out the old NIC now.

Whit


On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 01:44:37PM -0500, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> 3.2.2 kernel. Just in case it's of interest:
> 
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.304905] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.304924] WARNING: at kernel/timer.c:1011 del_timer_sync+0x56/0x60()
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.304929] Hardware name: SK22V10
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.304933] Modules linked in: joydev st lp parport_pc binfmt_misc nfsd lockd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc exportfs xt_limit ipt_REJECT xt_multiport ipt_LOG xt_tcpudp dm_crypt bridge xt_state stp iptable_filter ip_
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: crc_itu_t sata_via [last unloaded: ppa]
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.305073] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.2.2-black01 #1
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.305078] Call Trace:
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.305083]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff81063d8f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.305105]  [<ffffffff81063dea>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.305111]  [<ffffffff81074406>] del_timer_sync+0x56/0x60
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.305130]  [<ffffffffa002ee79>] pnic2_lnk_change+0xe9/0x698 [tulip]
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.305145]  [<ffffffffa00283a9>] tulip_interrupt+0x1e9/0x1010 [tulip]
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.305159]  [<ffffffff810d4d04>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x54/0x200  
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.305169]  [<ffffffff810d4f04>] handle_irq_event+0x54/0x80
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.305178]  [<ffffffff810d7eca>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x6a/0x100
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.305190]  [<ffffffff81015232>] handle_irq+0x22/0x40
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.305199]  [<ffffffff815e9a1d>] do_IRQ+0x5d/0xe0
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.305210]  [<ffffffff815df0ee>] common_interrupt+0x6e/0x6e
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.305215]  <EOI>  [<ffffffff8103b21b>] ? native_safe_halt+0xb/0x10  
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.305233]  [<ffffffff8101b9c1>] default_idle+0x41/0xe0
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.305241]  [<ffffffff8101babd>] amd_e400_idle+0x5d/0x120
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.305250]  [<ffffffff81012276>] cpu_idle+0xd6/0x110     
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.305259]  [<ffffffff815d70e8>] start_secondary+0x1e0/0x1e7
> Jan 29 11:15:31 whit kernel: [50599.305267] ---[ end trace 525e0a5d40ea44de ]---
> 
> Seeing "tulip" there, I'm guessing this relates to this old NIC:
> 
>   LNE100TX [Linksys EtherFast 10/100]
> 
> Whit

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-09 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-29 18:44 WARNING: at kernel/timer.c:1011 del_timer_sync+0x56/0x60() - 3.2.2 - tulip? Whit Blauvelt
2012-02-09 14:43 ` Whit Blauvelt [this message]
2012-02-10 22:51   ` Ignorant question: Is via rhine dangerous when on but not networked? Whit Blauvelt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120209144350.GA10609@black.transpect.com \
    --to=whit@transpect.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.