From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173017pub.verizon.net (vms173017pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.17]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11ADE00307 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 08:36:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.178.225.66]) by vms173017.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LZ4004A3WTHLTI0@vms173017.mailsrvcs.net> for meta-ti@yoctoproject.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:36:54 -0600 (CST) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 735F5200B9; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:36:51 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:36:51 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Brian Hutchinson Message-id: <20120209163651.GA3917@denix.org> References: <4F32F1B3.8090000@mlbassoc.com> <4F32F31B.2000303@gmail.com> <59EDC5ED-F339-48E8-8C4D-7137C23927CD@dominion.thruhere.net> <4F32F59B.7010804@mlbassoc.com> <8EA0B5D5-4DC5-4F48-83E6-B019862BD57F@dominion.thruhere.net> <4F32F87E.2070907@mlbassoc.com> <38997C75-E36D-4A49-96D0-FB5E8A52817D@gmail.com> <4F331E78.3000302@ti.com> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: building Yocto for Pandaboard X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:36:54 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 11:23:14AM -0500, Brian Hutchinson wrote: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:16 PM, William Mills wrote: > > As Gary said there has not been too many end user questions on meta-ti yet. > > All I care about is meta-ti as that is what all our products are based > on. I've been watching subject for a while now trying to discern all > the issues and make a wise choice. Brian, > I'm wanting to switch from Arago to whatever TI supports next as I > supply the rest of our development team with tools and images that > they build applications on for our products and I can't jerk them > around changing distros. As you are aware, Arago is not going away - there is work going on in meta-arago layer to update/port it to the new Yocto infrastructure. Arago/meta-arago is still going to be the official platform distribution for TI SDK products. But, a separate meta-ti layer was created early in the process to detach and unify the BSP layer and allow people to use TI hardware with different distributions. And that's actually part of the problem, as distributions like religions conflict with each other in a single layer... :) -- Denys