From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
"Greg KH" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>, "San Mehat" <san@google.com>,
"Colin Cross" <ccross@android.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Turn lock_task_sighand() into a static inline
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 20:45:19 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120209164519.GA10266@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120208152750.GA15782@redhat.com>
It appears that sparse tool understands static inline functions for
context balance checking, so let's turn the macros into an inline func.
This makes the code a little bit more robust.
Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
---
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:27:50PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 02/07, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 04:27:32PM -0500, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > >
> > > Some __cond_lock() caller are inline functions. Is this bad?
> >
> > No, that's great, actually. :-) Not obvious, but seems like
> > sparse understands __cond_lock in inline functions, so I'd
> > better use it.
>
> Hmm, great...
>
> may be you can update lock_task_sighand() too ? (in a separate
> patch of course).
Sure thing. Here it goes...
include/linux/sched.h | 15 +++++++++------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index e82f721..22ae10e 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2394,12 +2394,15 @@ static inline void task_unlock(struct task_struct *p)
extern struct sighand_struct *__lock_task_sighand(struct task_struct *tsk,
unsigned long *flags);
-#define lock_task_sighand(tsk, flags) \
-({ struct sighand_struct *__ss; \
- __cond_lock(&(tsk)->sighand->siglock, \
- (__ss = __lock_task_sighand(tsk, flags))); \
- __ss; \
-}) \
+static inline struct sighand_struct *lock_task_sighand(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ unsigned long *flags)
+{
+ struct sighand_struct *ret;
+
+ ret = __lock_task_sighand(tsk, flags);
+ (void)__cond_lock(&tsk->sighand->siglock, ret);
+ return ret;
+}
static inline void unlock_task_sighand(struct task_struct *tsk,
unsigned long *flags)
--
1.7.8.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-09 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-01 4:33 [PATCH] staging: android/lowmemorykiller: Don't grab tasklist_lock Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-02 12:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-02 17:16 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-03 0:03 ` [PATCH v3] " Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-03 16:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-03 16:30 ` [PATCH] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-06 16:29 ` [PATCH 1/6] oom: Make find_lock_task_mm() sparse-aware Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-06 16:35 ` Greg KH
2012-02-06 18:59 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-06 19:18 ` Greg KH
2012-02-06 21:27 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-07 4:48 ` [PATCH v2 " Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-07 5:17 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-08 15:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-09 16:45 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2012-02-11 23:10 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Turn lock_task_sighand() into a static inline tip-bot for Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-15 13:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-06 16:29 ` [PATCH 2/6] oom: Get rid of sparse warnings Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-06 21:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-07 4:20 ` [PATCH v2 " Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-07 5:38 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-07 6:23 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-08 18:13 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-06 16:29 ` [PATCH 3/6] staging: android/lowmemorykiller: Don't grab tasklist_lock Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-06 16:36 ` Greg KH
2012-02-06 16:42 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-09 0:56 ` Greg KH
2012-02-08 15:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-06 16:29 ` [PATCH 4/6] staging: android/lowmemorykiller: Better mm handling Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-06 21:36 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-08 15:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-06 16:29 ` [PATCH 5/6] staging: android/lowmemorykiller: No need for task->signal check Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-06 21:38 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-08 15:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-06 16:30 ` [PATCH 6/6] staging: android/lowmemorykiller: Do not kill kernel threads Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-06 21:38 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-08 15:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120209164519.GA10266@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=anton.vorontsov@linaro.org \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=san@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.