From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net (vms173003pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.3]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8374E00307 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 09:16:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.178.225.66]) by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LZ400IW2YMIHLA0@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> for meta-ti@yoctoproject.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:15:55 -0600 (CST) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D84DF200B9; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:15:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:15:53 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Gary Thomas Message-id: <20120209171553.GD3917@denix.org> References: <4F32F59B.7010804@mlbassoc.com> <8EA0B5D5-4DC5-4F48-83E6-B019862BD57F@dominion.thruhere.net> <4F32F87E.2070907@mlbassoc.com> <38997C75-E36D-4A49-96D0-FB5E8A52817D@gmail.com> <4F331E78.3000302@ti.com> <20120209163651.GA3917@denix.org> <4F33FB87.8030102@balister.org> <4F33FE75.90907@mlbassoc.com> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <4F33FE75.90907@mlbassoc.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: building Yocto for Pandaboard X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:16:02 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:12:21AM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2012-02-09 09:59, Philip Balister wrote: > >On 02/09/2012 08:36 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >>On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 11:23:14AM -0500, Brian Hutchinson wrote: > >>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:16 PM, William Mills wrote: > >>>>As Gary said there has not been too many end user questions on meta-ti yet. > >>> > >>> All I care about is meta-ti as that is what all our products are based > >>> on. I've been watching subject for a while now trying to discern all > >>> the issues and make a wise choice. > >> > >>Brian, > >> > >>> I'm wanting to switch from Arago to whatever TI supports next as I > >>> supply the rest of our development team with tools and images that > >>> they build applications on for our products and I can't jerk them > >>> around changing distros. > >> > >>As you are aware, Arago is not going away - there is work going on in > >>meta-arago layer to update/port it to the new Yocto infrastructure. > >> > >>Arago/meta-arago is still going to be the official platform distribution for > >>TI SDK products. But, a separate meta-ti layer was created early in the > >>process to detach and unify the BSP layer and allow people to use TI hardware > >>with different distributions. And that's actually part of the problem, as > >>distributions like religions conflict with each other in a single layer... :) > >> > > > >Denys, from my point of view, there are two issues we need to solve: > > > >1) Defining the meta-ti toolchain dependencies. Angstrom uses gcc-4.5 > >for various reasons. Will the TI programs work against all gcc versions > >available from oe-core/meta-oe? > > I've had good luck with the meta-ti layer + Poky (oe-core & meta-yocto). > I have my own kernels (for other OMAP boards that are not mainline), so > I don't use the meta-ti kernel recipes, but I do use much of the rest, > including the DSP bits. Can you elaborate on what your custom kernels are based on? Thanks. -- Denys