From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] ARM: EXYNOS: add board file for SMDK5250 Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 23:36:00 +0000 Message-ID: <201202092336.00524.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1328024354-4277-1-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> <20120201093423.GA3002@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <069401cce71e$56bffe80$043ffb80$%kim@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:65170 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758677Ab2BIXgQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2012 18:36:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <069401cce71e$56bffe80$043ffb80$%kim@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Kukjin Kim Cc: 'Will Deacon' , 'Olof Johansson' , 'Kyungmin Park' , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk On Thursday 09 February 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Will Deacon wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 08:50:23AM +0000, Olof Johansson wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Kyungmin Park > > wrote: > > > > As I remember only DT based board file is acceptable for mainline? > > > > > > For a new SoC family like 5250 it would be much preferred to only add > > > device-tree enabled boards. > > > As I commented, I'd like to support both dt and non-dt for EXYNOS5250 and > I'm saying EXYNOS5250 DT patches will be submitted next time again. I think it would be much better to start with just the DT based platform for exynos5 and leave out the atag based platform. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 23:36:00 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 5/9] ARM: EXYNOS: add board file for SMDK5250 In-Reply-To: <069401cce71e$56bffe80$043ffb80$%kim@samsung.com> References: <1328024354-4277-1-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> <20120201093423.GA3002@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <069401cce71e$56bffe80$043ffb80$%kim@samsung.com> Message-ID: <201202092336.00524.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 09 February 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Will Deacon wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 08:50:23AM +0000, Olof Johansson wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Kyungmin Park > > wrote: > > > > As I remember only DT based board file is acceptable for mainline? > > > > > > For a new SoC family like 5250 it would be much preferred to only add > > > device-tree enabled boards. > > > As I commented, I'd like to support both dt and non-dt for EXYNOS5250 and > I'm saying EXYNOS5250 DT patches will be submitted next time again. I think it would be much better to start with just the DT based platform for exynos5 and leave out the atag based platform. Arnd