From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
To: hongkaixing@huawei.com
Cc: bicky.shi@huawei.com, xiaowei.yang@huawei.com,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, yanqiangjun@huawei.com,
hanweidong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xenpaging:close domU's event channel and free port
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:40:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120210164010.GA10009@aepfle.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9f4640e40d4f31563885.1328777634@h00166998.china.huawei.com>
On Thu, Feb 09, hongkaixing@huawei.com wrote:
> xenpaging:close domU's event channel and free port
>
> Every domain (X86 64 bit)has 4096 event channels.In source code,
> domU's event channel is allocated in mem_event_enable(),but just
> unbind dom0's event channel in xenpaging_teardown().This bug will
> result in that we can not use xenpaging after reopening it for 4096
> times.We should free domU's event channel in mem_event_disable().so
> that we can reuse the port.
Does that fix a real bug?
xenpaging_teardown() does both xc_mem_paging_disable() and
xc_evtchn_unbind(). The former fails often because the domain is gone
and so it doesnt even reach the function in mem_event.c.
The latter is called unconditionally.
Also I would expect that once xenpaging exits the kernel driver does a
cleanup of all used ports. I havent checked wether thats true.
Olaf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-10 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-09 8:53 [PATCH] xenpaging:close domU's event channel and free port hongkaixing
2012-02-10 16:22 ` Tim Deegan
2012-02-10 16:32 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-02-10 16:40 ` Olaf Hering [this message]
2012-02-13 5:47 ` Hongkaixing
2012-02-13 12:11 ` Ian Campbell
2012-02-15 2:24 ` Hongkaixing
2012-02-15 9:27 ` Ian Campbell
2012-02-17 6:21 ` Hongkaixing
2012-02-17 8:20 ` Ian Campbell
2012-02-17 10:28 ` Hongkaixing
2012-02-14 20:59 ` Olaf Hering
2012-02-14 21:19 ` Olaf Hering
2012-02-15 2:33 ` Hongkaixing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120210164010.GA10009@aepfle.de \
--to=olaf@aepfle.de \
--cc=bicky.shi@huawei.com \
--cc=hanweidong@huawei.com \
--cc=hongkaixing@huawei.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=xiaowei.yang@huawei.com \
--cc=yanqiangjun@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.