From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] signal: give SEND_SIG_FORCED more power to beat SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:25:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120210212532.GL19392@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120210200021.GA20898@redhat.com>
Hello, Oleg,.
I can't provide any meaningful constructive criticism but have one
bike-shedding one.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 09:00:21PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
> index c73c428..bfb2b97 100644
> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -1059,7 +1059,8 @@ static int __send_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t,
>
> assert_spin_locked(&t->sighand->siglock);
>
> - if (!prepare_signal(sig, t, from_ancestor_ns))
> + if (!prepare_signal(sig, t,
> + from_ancestor_ns || (info == SEND_SIG_FORCED)))
How about the following indentation instead? :)
if (!prepare_signal(sig, t,
from_ancestor_ns || (info == SEND_SIG_FORCED)))
Overall, the changes look sane to me but I haven't really thought
about it deeply. Please feel free to add Reviewed-by for 2-4.
Thank you.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-10 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-10 20:00 [PATCH 0/4] signal: force_sig cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 20:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] signal: give SEND_SIG_FORCED more power to beat SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 21:25 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-02-14 17:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-14 17:53 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-10 20:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] signal: cosmetic, s/from_ancestor_ns/force/ in prepare_signal() paths Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 20:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] signal: oom_kill_task: use SEND_SIG_FORCED instead of force_sig() Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-13 16:49 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-10 20:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] signal: zap_pid_ns_processes: s/SEND_SIG_NOINFO/SEND_SIG_FORCED/ Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120210212532.GL19392@google.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anton.vorontsov@linaro.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.