From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173009pub.verizon.net (vms173009pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.9]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107AFE003E4 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:04:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.178.225.66]) by vms173009.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LZ700CFYNAPNVT0@vms173009.mailsrvcs.net> for meta-ti@yoctoproject.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:04:02 -0600 (CST) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 48D7420272; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:03:57 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:03:57 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: "Monk, Roger" Message-id: <20120211040357.GC2525@denix.org> References: <1328013657-2069-1-git-send-email-bigotp@acm.org> <4C82F39BABFE6A429733A300DEBF52240B5AC841@DNCE02.ent.ti.com> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <4C82F39BABFE6A429733A300DEBF52240B5AC841@DNCE02.ent.ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: "meta-ti@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Resubmit TI DSP build issues related to installer X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:04:13 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 12:45:03AM +0000, Monk, Roger wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:40:53, Peter A. Bigot wrote: > > Subject: [meta-ti] [PATCH 0/4] Resubmit TI DSP build issues related to > > installer > > > > From: "Peter A. Bigot" > > > > This patch set re-submits the (updated) uncommitted parts of my > > 27Dec2011 patch set to get gstreamer-ti and its dependencies to build > > in a pristine work environment. It was left back on 29Dec2011 with: > > > > > I'm going to wait for Roger to get back from holidays to comment on > > the installer issues, I'll push the CE and dmai patches later today. > > > > Thanks for re-basing/re-submitting - sorry this has taken a while. Your > patches look good - however, I have some other failing installer scenarios > like these for which I have a similar, but unfortunately, not the same > patchset, in progress. I hope to review yours in the coming days if ok. Roger, Were you able to look into this issue and review Peter's patches and/or merge with your work? Please let me know if you are making progress and new more time. Thanks for your time and support! -- Denys